Friday, May 14, 2010

Iron Man 2

Wow, I'm actually impressed with myself that this blog has been up, and (somewhat) maintained with posts between Iron Man and its sequel being released in theaters. Reading that "review" from years back, and not a lot stands out. Good for fans and everybody else? Sure, the sequel is like that too. But I'm really not sure what fans would think of this second romp into Tony Stark's world. Being a fan of comics and movies, I can say that I left a little disappointed.


Not enough action? I don't know. Not enough plot? Sure...good acting? Yeah, that was there. There were good moments but nothing really popped for me. I'm happy that this is a super-hero movie that is not in your face with cheesy super-her movie cliches. It really does appeal to everyone.

As for the experience, it was interesting. I picked up the tickets about an hour and fifteen minutes early (this was Tuesday) thinking it was going to be jammed busy. Nobody in sight. I remember lining up for Daredevil an hour early and we weren't nearly the first in line. Granted, this wasn't the first day of release, but it was the first cheap-Tuesday of release. Typically they are packed. Now, getting there a half hour early we were able to find a good seat, and I did discover the show was sold out. It just seems like things have come a long way: when a terrible super-hero movie like Daredevil can command large lines in North Bay, of all places, and nobody cares to show up to see Iron Man even a half hour early, it either indicates that movie-goers are burned by those old hero movies, or the recession has really hurt the industry. Or something else happened: I'm not an expert by any means.

Another thing I made mention of on the first show was the movie being out of focus. This was still a problem, but not to a degree that made me notice more than a few times. Perhaps I'm too keen on what out of focus is, but it was definitely there. In this day of age, where we are getting digital, 3-D projectors and seeing razor-sharp images from Avatar, people are going to start noticing the poor quality they've been subjected to on everything else.

Then of course there was the bit at the end: Thor's hammer. Again, I'm looking forward to seeing it but by no means getting excited to see it. Honestly, I never really followed these characters in the comics; it was all about X-Men, Spider-Man and some others when I was a kid. What was really amusing, are some people's comments when the bonus footage started rolling: "this better be worth it." Really? Sitting for that extra five minutes through the credits after a two hour movie is really a drain on your time? Shouldn't you be more upset  about the fifteen minutes of ads and commercials before the movie? I don't know, people are crazy. I used to sit through all the credits of all the movies I would see in the theatre. Now, if you do that the usher will come and tell you there is nothing to see. Nothing to see, but it was paying appreciation to everybody involved.

That's it!

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

The Omega Man

It was a double feature on Sunday, as I got my movie collection in order and figured out that there are many hours in the day. Let me attack that point first: when you go to watch a movie, immediately the word "movie" brings to mind multiple hours of commitment. But friends, it does not have to be that way. Where did this come from? Is it because, if you planned on going to a movie, you would be going to the theatre: driving there, picking up friends (or waiting for them), standing in line, buying the ticket, waiting in line for food, finding a seat, then waiting for the movie to start, because you arrived a bit early. When the film squeals by you sit through another ten minutes plus of previews and (television) commercials. By god, when you are done with the hour and forty five minute movie, you've just invested three hours of your life.

But it's not the case at home: you're already on the couch, load up your movie, skip the BS and start viewing. The movie is not THAT long. In fact, you could see two for the time cost of one. So that's what I did.

First up was Away We Go, who stars The Office guy, Jim plus beard, and the adorable Maya Rudolph from SNL fame. Decent movie, that doesn't get too involved in itself. But it's the second movie I want to focus on: The Omega Man.

This one has been sitting in the collection for a while, and gained interest as I Am Legend released. Man was released in 1971 and that perhaps contributes to the hesitation of watching it. But it's watch well worth it: you're never entirely sure what the creatures are that are tormenting Neville, but you are damn happy they talk and have character, which is leagues beyond the CGI vampire/weirdo's polluting Will Smith's vehicle. Heston is interesting as Neville, as he sports some real gnarly smile when he shows teeth, and a knack for killing these damned creatures. His relationship with them is fantastic, as he shoots first and thinks later in the earlier part of the film, plot advances and character development show that these are/were people, and calls into question his relentless pursuit of murdering them all. But also, on the flip side, you have the leader who is bent on killing Heston simply because the guy won't leave. By the end of the film I really have to step back and admire how they conveyed this on screen: for any modern movie it would be enough that Neville is human, creatures are not and that means they must all die. Here, I got the feeling that, in this post-apocalyptic world, these two factions could in fact live together in some form of "peace."

I really wish modern movies would take the time and devote the subtlety of plot, social commentary and conflicted characters that these classics have. It can be done: you don't have to look far for a movie like The Omega Man.

One bit of interesting trivia from IMDB was that the author didn't care about this movie as an adaptation of his novel, as the movie was so far removed from his original vision. Time to read that book. And isn't it great that they could make a movie, so far removed, and still be relevant and good? When a movie is made now, and is so far removed, it's considered trash, or built for movie-audiences. That concept is insulting: we, the people, can handle an intellectual "action" movie.

Anyway. Check it out. I really loved it.